The Pacific War Online Encyclopedia |
Previous: LSM Class, Allied Landing Ships | Table of Contents | Next: Lu Chung-lin |
ONI 226 |
Tonnage | 2400 tons loaded for landing operations |
Dimensions | 327' by 50' by 13' 99.7m by 15.2m by 4.0m |
Maximum speed | 11 knots |
Complement | 119 |
Armament | 13 0.50 machine
guns 6 20mm Oerlikon AA guns |
Cruising speed |
8 knots |
Machinery |
2-shaft diesel (1800 shp) |
Range |
12,000 nautical miles |
Capacity | 20 medium tanks or 750
tons cargo |
Modifications |
Beginning in late 1943, LSTs
began shipping additional antiaircraft
armament. This typically brought the antiaircraft battery up
to 3 to 5 40mm
Bofors AA guns, 11 to 18 20mm guns, 4 to 18 machine
guns, and one 3"/50
AA gun.
By the end of the war, 8 40mm guns was
standard armament. |
The Landing Ship, Tank, or LST,
was designed to land up to twenty tanks on a beach. It did
so by dropping a ramp onto the beach through a set of bow doors
after the ship was deliberately grounded. The design dated to
November 1941, when a British delegation to the United States
asked for 200 ships and 400 craft capable of bringing tanks
ashore. The former became the LST and the latter the LCT.
An important design requirement for the LST was that
it be an ocean-going vessel, capable of crossing the Atlantic.
This could not be achieved with the shallow draft required for
landing operations, but the problem was solved by adding two
submarine-style ballast tanks. When these were filled, the LST had
sufficient draft for ocean passage. The tanks could be quickly
pumped out when the ship approached the landing beach, reducing
the draft for the grounding operation. However, even when
ballasted down, the LST had poor seakeeping. The flat-bottomed
hull required for landing operations limited the ship's speed and
handling, and the LST experienced severe pounding in heavy seas.
This occasionally caused the deck to develop cracks. The
combination of shallow draft and broad beam also meant the ships
had a very quick roll that was very uncomfortable for the crews
and required cargo to be tightly secured.
Other elements of the design included a pair of
skegs resembling those of the new fast battleships.
This created a tunnel into which the propellers and rudders were
placed, protecting them during grounding and from fouling by the
stern anchor chain. Vehicles on the tank deck were expected to
start their engines before the bow doors opened, and this required
a forest of portable ventilation ducts that could be connected to
the vehicle exhausts. Trucks
could be carried on the main deck but had to be lowered via an
elevator to the tank deck in order to exit through the bow. Later
models replaced the elevator with a hinged ramp that was more
complicated but hastened disembarkation. Starting with the Sicily
invasion in August 1943, LSTs were equipped with davits so that
they could carry six LCTs in
place of trucks on the main deck.
LSTs had rather light point defenses and were quite
slow, so that some wags claimed that “LST” stood for “Large Slow
Target.” In light of experience gained at New Georgia, LSTs in the
South Pacific shipped many additional antiaircraft guns by the
time of the Bougainville
landings. The ships were also equipped with barrage balloons, but
these were discarded in 1944 because they were too visible to
enemy search
aircraft. Many crews improvised additional
antiaircraft defenses using scrounged weapons, ranging from Army 37mm antiaircraft guns
and machine guns to additional 40mm guns. However, the ships had
good survivability, both because their broad beam gave them a
large reserve of stability and because their hulls were quite
strong. A total of 37 LSTs were lost to enemy attack during the
war, a small number considering that they were very lucrative
targets.
South Pacific LSTs were rarely used for their
designed purpose of bringing vehicles ashore. Instead, they were
used to land large quantities of supplies. At first, cargo was
stacked to the rear of a few preloaded trucks. The trucks would
discharge their cargo, then come back to be loaded with more,
while additional cargo was manhandled onto the beach. This allowed
about four times as much cargo to be carried as would have been
the case if all the cargo had been preloaded onto trucks, but the
unloading process was slow, taking about eight hours. The process
was improved by loading the cargo into trailers that could be
hauled ashore by tractors. About 33 trailers could be packed into
an LST with little loss of cargo capacity, and unloading was much
faster: An LST so loaded could discharge about 750 tons of cargo
in about two hours.
LSTs were designed for a beach slope of 1 in 50. On this ideal beach, an LST would ground evenly along her entire length and her ramp would come down on dry ground. On shallower beaches, the ramp would drop into the water, and the gap had to be bridged with interlocking pontoon units. On deeper beaches, the LST did not ground properly and was liable to yaw dangerously in the surf. In either case, the uneven grounding put considerable strain on the hull. Because few beaches were ideal, an LST was too badly worn out for further use in landing operations after about ten landings. The Navy judged that it was more cost-effective to build new LSTs than to refurbish the old ones or to try to strengthen the design. The old, worn-out LSTs were used for every imaginable purpose, including repair ships, floating barracks, floating depots, and hospital barges. Some were even fitted with a flight deck capable of operating a handful of light reconnaissance aircraft — a dubious concept at best.
A number of LSTs were modified by converting part of the troop deck into a small surgical suite. LST-464 was converted into a dedicated hospital ship, with a surgical suite, X-ray room, laboratory, and isolation ward. She began service off New Guinea with 7 Fleet and served with great distinction in the second Philippines campaign.
LSTs were considered a sufficient priority early in
the war that, on 28 May 1942, a number of Maritime Commission
shipyards were instructed to begin mass production of the ships
(as standard type S3-M2-K2). Some 75 LSTs were produced by
Maritime Commission shipyards, including 15 at a new yard near Oakland (Richmond #3a, later
redesignated Richmond #4) and 30 at Vancouver, which had
previously completed just two Liberty Ships.However,
most were built at the so-called "cornfield shipyards" along the
Ohio and Illinois Rivers. The
priority given to construction of LSTs significantly delayed the destroyer escort
program.
2/42 |
1 |
11/42 | 5 |
12/42 | 10 |
1/43 | 9 |
2/43 | 10 |
3/43 | 12 |
4/43 | 12 |
5/43 | 17 |
6/43 | 7 |
7/43 | 8 |
8/43 | 15 |
9/43 | 21 |
10/43 | 13 |
11/43 | 5 |
3/44 | 3 |
4/44 | 22 |
5/44 | 65 |
6/44 | 39 |
7/44 | 44 |
8/44 | 41 |
9/44 | 42 |
10/44 | 34 |
11/44 | 39 |
12/44 | 27 |
1/45 | 43 |
2/45 | 13 |
3/45 | 1 |
4/45 | 1 |
Total | 559 |
|
References
NavSource.Org (accessed 2009-10-1)
The Pacific War Online Encyclopedia © 2006, 2008-2009, 2012, 2016-2017, 2019 by Kent G. Budge. Index