
National
Archives #80-G-303914. Cropped by author.
LVT(1)
| Tonnage | 8.45 tons displacement |
| Dimensions | 21'6" by 9'10" 6.55m by 3.00m |
| Maximum speed | 15 mph on land 4 knots in water |
| Complement |
3 |
| Armament |
1 0.50 machine gun 1 0.30 machine gun |
| Range |
50 miles (80 km) in water 75 miles (120 km) on land |
| Capacity | 4,500 lbs (2040 kg) cargo or 20 troops |
| Variants |
The LVT(2) displaced 12.6 tons, could carry
6500 lbs (2950 kg) cargo or 24 troops, and 25mph/5.4 knots. It
also had double the range of the LVT(1). The LVT(3) could carry 8000 lbs (3600 kg) cargo or 24 troops. The LVT(4) closely resembled the LVT(2) but
added a rear ramp for rapid debarkation. The LVT(A)1 was armored, had a crew of 6, replaced the 0.50 machine gun with a 37mm gun and 0.30 machine gun in a turret, and could carry just 1000 lbs (450 kg) of cargo. The LVT(A)2 resembled the LVT(2) but was
armored and had a crew of 6. It was armed with two 0.50 machine guns
and a 0.30 machine gun. The LVT(A)4 was armored, had a crew of 6,
and had a turret with a 75mm howitzer
and a 0.50 machine gun. It could
carry 2000 lbs (900 kg) of ammunition or gear. |
Landing Vehicle, Tracked, or LVTs, were also known as amtracks,
alligators, or (in their fire support variants) as buffaloes. They were
amphibious tracked vehicles capable of crawling out of the water and
onto the beach and beyond. Later versions were thinly armored, and some were equipped with a
light tank turret to provide fire
support, making them equivalent to light amphibious tanks.
The LVT was derived from the Alligator, an amphibious vehicle invented by Donald Roebling in 1933 as a rescue vehicle for downed aviators in the Florida Everglades. A Life article in October 1937 brought the Alligator to the attention of Marine brass, but both the Navy and Roebling resisted Marine procurement, the Navy because it felt it had its hands full with conventional landing craft, and Roebling because he wished his invention to be used only for peaceful purposes. Roebling was persuaded otherwise by Army general E.P. Moses after war broke out in Europe, and the Marines finally got their opportunity to test the design in November 1940. A production order followed and the first units were delivered in July 1941.
LVTs proved remarkably seaworthy and, with their low silhouette, were difficult to hit while still in the water. Their steel hull was too thin to provide much protection from fire, but some were retrofitted with 9mm of cab armor in time for the Tarawa invasion, and some degree of armor protection became a standard feature thereafter. They could climb an incredible 60 percent grade. Their greatest weakness was their very slow speed afloat, due to the inefficiency of the tracks in water. However, they did not need to stop at the waterline to disembark troops and cargo, where the defenders often had their guns zeroed in.
LVTs first saw use at Guadalcanal,
but only for landing supplies.
They were not especially successful,
being prone to throw a track or stall in the water. Turner was unimpressed
with the craft, but Smith
and the Marines saw their
potential and continued to make improvements. They were first used to
bring troops
ashore at Tarawa, where they were
the only landing craft able to
make it over the shallow reef and
deliver their troops to the beach.
Unfortunately, there were only about 100 immediately available for the
assault, which not nearly enough for the entire landing force, and most
of the troops had to disembark from less capable landing craft and wade
across the reef
in the face of withering fire. Following the Tarawa campaign,
production of LVTs
received a high priority, reaching 500 per month in the early part of
1944. Later invasions
were thus more amply
supplied
with LVTs, which were deemed essential whenever the shore was protected
by a fringing reef. LCVPs continued
to be used where there was a sandy beach without a shallow reef.
The craft proved highly versatile. From the Peleliu
campaign on, a number of LVTs were fitted with a flamethrower for use against fortifications. The vulnerable
LVT was usually flanked by a pair of gun tanks for protection. As the
craft became more available, a number were
converted to armored ambulances carrying a doctor and three corpsman.
LVTs were also employed as guide boats for tanks unloading onto
submerged reefs, since if the LVT ran into a shell hole it would float
and the tanks would not.
They were relatively expensive landing craft at $35,000
apiece.
The following table gives total production. About 38% of this
was
allocated to the Pacific until the final year of the war, when most of
the amphibious fleet
began to be shifted to the Pacific.
| Year |
LVT |
LVT(A) |
|---|---|---|
| 1940-1941
|
72 |
0 |
| 1942-1 to
1942-6 |
258 |
2 |
| 1942-7 |
74 |
0 |
| 1942-8 |
94 |
0 |
|
1942-9 |
105 |
0 |
|
1942-10 |
52 |
1 |
|
1942-11 |
133 |
0 |
| 1942-12 |
125 |
0 |
| 1943-1 |
103 |
0 |
| 1943-2 |
86 |
0 |
| 1943-3 |
75 |
0 |
| 1943-4 |
35 |
7 |
| 1943-5 |
61 |
47 |
| 1943-6 |
117 |
55 |
| 1943-7 |
174 |
58 |
| 1943-8 |
219 |
45 |
| 1943-9 |
236 |
68 |
| 1943-10 |
243 |
65 |
| 1943-11 |
259 |
70 |
| 1943-12 |
246 |
73 |
| 1944-1 |
341 |
101 |
| 1944-2 |
397 |
114 |
| 1944-3 |
604 |
181 |
| 1944-4 |
680 |
194 |
| 1944-5 |
762 |
217 |
| 1944-6 |
696 |
198 |
| 1944-7 |
615 |
196 |
| 1944-8 |
583 |
176 |
| 1944-9 |
510 |
127 |
| 1944-10 |
696 |
173 |
| 1944-11 |
652 |
151 |
| 1944-12 |
599 |
130 |
| 1945-1 |
683 |
125 |
| 1945-2 |
727 |
125 |
| 1945-3 |
817 |
115 |
| 1945-4 |
790 |
70 |
| 1945-5 |
792 |
65 |
| 1945-6 |
785 |
60 |
| 1945-7 |
589 |
58 |
| 1945-8 |
406 |
52 |
References
Friedman
(2002)
Gilbert (2001)
HyperWar
(accessed 2007-12-28)
Leighton and
Coakley (1955)
The Pacific War Online Encyclopedia © 2007-2009 by
Kent G.
Budge. Index