The Pacific War Online Encyclopedia |
Previous: Siberia | Table of Contents | Next: Sibuyan Sea |
U.S. Army. Via
ibiblio.org
Frank Sibert was born in Kentucky in an army family,
with both a father and a brother who achieved star rank. He spent
the First World War as an aide to his father, who commanded 1 Division, and then took
command of a machine gun battalion.
After the war, he took the usual courses expected of a rising
officer and served in a number of staff
and teaching positions.
Though originally slated for division command before
war broke out, he was assigned instead as liaison between Stilwell and the Chinese 5 Army
in
the first Burma campaign, then
helped
set up the Ramgarh training center. However, he
had had difficulty keeping up with Stilwell's walk out of Burma,
was in poor health, and was more interested in leading troops than
training them, and so he asked to be transferred back to the
States.
In spite of Stilwell's negative evaluation, Marshall
gave Sibert command of 6 Division
in
the Southwest
Pacific, which he led at the battle of Lone Tree Hill in the
Trier
Mountains inland of Wakde and at Sansapor. His performance here
so impressed Krueger
that Sibert was given command of X Corps, which
he led in the
invasions of Leyte, Luzon, and eastern Mindanao. Sibert's performance
during the Luzon campaign disappointed Eichelberger, who
was probably also influenced by Stilwell, who told Eichelberger
during an inspection tour that Sibert was "just plain stupid"
(Taaffe 2011).
Taaffe (2011) evaluates Sibert as the weakest of the
American corps commanders in the Pacific, noting that he came
across as enthusiastic and friendly, but was lacking in judgment
and originality and had a stubborn streak. During his time at the
Infantry School, Sibert became so obsessed with bridge that he
took a lap board with him on his daily train commutes and walked
the aisles to try to recruit players. He was also plagued with
poor health throughout the war. His health may explain why he was
one of the few senior American commanders whose ability seemed to
actually deteriorate over time. Eichelberger called Sibert to his
headquarters prior to the invasion
of Japan to candidly discuss his shortcomings, which
included "leaving the main task and chasing off on a side issue"
(quoted by Taaffe 2011). Eichelberger would likely have relieved
Sibert if the war had not ended when it did. Sibert seemed to
perform best with close supervision, which was Krueger's style but
not Eichelberger's.
1891-1-3 |
Born in Bowling Green,
Kentucky |
|
1912 |
Second
lieutenant |
Graduates from West Point |
1924 |
Infantry School |
|
1924 |
Command and General Staff
School |
|
1929 |
Army War College |
|
1934-8-15 |
Commander, Headquarters Battalion, 29
Regiment |
|
1935-8-15 |
Instructor, Infantry School |
|
1937-1-1 |
Infantry Board |
|
1938-9-1 |
Executive officer, 2 Regiment |
|
1939-1-15 |
Commander, Fort Wayne, Michigan |
|
1939-6-7 |
Commander, Camp Custer, Michigan |
|
1939-11-1 |
5 Division |
|
1940-7 |
Commander, 32 Regiment |
|
1941-10 |
Assistant commander, 44 Division |
|
1942-2 |
Staff officer, China-Burma-India | |
1942-10 |
Major
general |
Commander, 6
Division |
1944-7-10
|
Commander, X Corps |
|
1946 |
Retires |
|
1980-6-24 |
Dies |
References
Ammentorp (accessed 2015-3-26)
The Pacific War Online Encyclopedia © 2007-2008, 2010, 2016 by Kent G. Budge. Index