
National Archives #80-G-225341
In 1924, as Bill
Halsey was preparing to turn over command of destroyer Osborne to Ray Spruance, he advised
the bridge crew that they should not let Spruance's quiet
manner deceive them into thinking they were getting anything but an
outstandingly
competent commander. The crew soon learned that Spruance liked a quiet
bridge, without extraneous chit-chat or the use of first names, and
with orders given concisely and clearly. Tuohy (2007) recounts a
telling incident:
Once in the harbor of Bizerte in French Tunisia, Osborne was anchored in 6 fathoms, or 36 feet, of water. A distraught torpedo officer rushed to the bridge and reported, "Captain, we've just dropped a depth charge over the stern!"
"Well, pick it up and put it back," was Spruance's measured response.
The brainy officer later served three tours at the prestigious Naval
War College, one as a student and two as an instructor. As a student,
he wrote admiringly of Japanese
Admiral Togo, victor of the Battle of Tsushima,
who kept his patience and cool head in battle and whose
command style was to give his subordinates considerable freedom of
action and let them exercise their initiative. These were the qualities
that would characterize Spruance himself as a flag officer.
Things move so fast in naval actions, and the consequences that hang on the results of these actions are often so momentous, that fast teamwork is essential. Teamwork is something that comes best from associations, training and indoctrination. There are too many variables possible in war for everything to be foreseen and planned for ahead of time. Our plans can be made out in great detail up to the time we hit the enemy. After that, they have to be flexible, ready to counter what the enemy may try to do to us, and ready to take advantage of the breaks that may come to us. To do that, the man on the spot must know where he fits into the operation, and he must be able to act on his own initiative either without any orders at all, because radio silence may be in effect, or on very brief orders because there is not time for long instructions.
(Tuohy 2007)
After war broke out in Europe, Spruance was named commandant of 10
Naval District, covering the
Caribbean Sea. The destroyers for bases
agreement in September 1940
focused attention on 10 Naval District, and Spruance received frequent
visits from the upper brass. This
included Ernest King, future
commander of the U.S. Fleet, and the two officers developed a mutual
respect. When the Marines held landing exercises at Culebra,
Puerto Rico, King invited Spruance to observed the exercises from
King's flagship, where Spruance became acquainted with "Howling Mad" Smith, the Marine amphibious landing expert.
Spruance concluded that Smith was a man who knew his business.
By the time war broke out in the Pacific, Spruance was a rear
admiral and commander of the cruiser
screen for Halsey's carriers.
When Halsey fell ill before the
crucial Midway
campaign, Nimitz
asked him to name his own
replacement.
Halsey named Spruance.
Nimitz had already
decided to appoint Spruance as his chief-of-staff, but delayed the
assignment
until after the victory at Midway.
Though Spruance was junior to Fletcher, who therefore
commanded the American
carrier forces, Spruance took the initiative to launch a full deck load
strike at maximum range in order to catch the Japanese refueling and
rearming their aircraft.
The results were devastating. Spruance's and Fletcher's strikes chanced
to arrive over the Japanese force at about the same time, and in just
fifteen minutes the Dauntlesses
knocked
out three of the four large Japanese carriers in Nagumo's force. After
Fletcher's flagship, Yorktown, was badly damaged by
a counter strike of Japanese dive
bombers, Fletcher turned tactical command of the American force
over to Spruance. Spruance thus made most of the critical decisions
during the battle, including the controversial decision to sail east
that night. Spruance was criticized for letting so much of the Japanese
Navy escape, but destruction of the Japanese fleet was never an
expectation for this battle, and postwar analysis confirms that
Spruance would have run directly into Yamamoto's powerful surface
force, which was superbly trained
for night actions, had he chosen to
pursue the enemy.
Following the battle of Midway, one of Spruance's staff read aloud a
radio news report of a particularly gruesome murder in the United
States. Another staff officer wondered how anyone but a madman could be
capable of such a thing. Spruance quietly replied, "What do you think I
have been doing all morning?" Spruance would later speak against the fire bombing of Japanese
cities.
It is ironic that Halsey should
recommend Spruance to an
important command, for the two men were polar opposites.
Unlike Halsey, who
was an aggressive, flamboyant, and vulgar aviator, much beloved of his
sailors,
Spruance was an admiral's admiral – cool,
intellectual, and calculating, with
no aviation experience and no love for publicity. He was a nonsmoker
and could often be found exercising on the deck of his flagship, and he
insisted on an undisturbed night's sleep when not actually conducting
combat operations.
I believe that making war is a game that requires cold and careful calculation. It might be a very serious thing if we turned the wrong way, just once.
It seems clear that Nimitz intended Spruance to be the second
admiral in the Pacific and commander of the fighting fleet. However,
Spruance could never get out from under Halsey's shadow. In the last
two years of the
war, the two men took turns commanding the main combat elements of the
Pacific
Fleet. These were known as 3 Fleet when Halsey
was in
command and 5 Fleet
when Spruance commanded. Captain George Dyer said of the two leaders
(Tuohy
2007):
My feeling was one of confidence when Spruance was there. When you moved into Admiral Spruance's command from Admiral Halsey's ... you moved from an area in which you never knew what you were going to do in the next five minutes or how you were going to do it, because the printed instructions were never up to date.... He never did things the same way twice. When you moved into Admiral Spruance's command, the printed instructions were up to date, and you did things in accordance with them.
Notwithstanding their different personalities,
Spruance and Halsey were close friends, which helped make this unusual
command arrangement work. In fact, Spruance had a knack for getting
along with difficult people, including his friend Kelly Turner, the
hotheaded commander of 5 Fleet's amphibious force. One exception was John Towers, a constant critic
of Spruance, who Spruance came to despise for his naked ambition.
Spruance also took some time to warm to his fast carrier commander, Marc Mitscher, who he believed
(with some cause) had performed poorly at Midway. However, Spruance
gave Mitscher considerable freedom to command the carrier force his own
way, and the two men eventually developed a great respect for each
other.
Spruance was strongly criticized by
aviators for failing to
aggressively pursue the Japanese
fleet at the Battle of the Philippine
Sea. Spruance understood
his primary mission to be supporting the
amphibious invasion of Saipan,
and he took no chance of a
Japanese force slipping
in behind him. His fear was not irrational. Prados (1995) reports
that Spruance had an intelligence
digest, based on documents captured from Combined Fleet chief of staff Fukudome, indicating
Japanese plans
for such an end run. King supported Spruance, telling him that
"Spruance, you did a damn fine job there. No matter what other people
tell you, your decision was correct" (Tuohy 2007). Mitscher told his
chief of staff, Arleigh Burke, that (ibid.):
You and I have been in many battles, and we know there are always some mistakes. This time we were right because the enemy did what we expected him to do. Admiral Spruance could have been right. He's one of the finest officers I know of. It was his job to protect the landing force....
Ironically, Halsey would later take criticism for aggressively pursuing a Japanese carrier force and leaving the Leyte invasion forces vulnerable to Kurita's surface force, which slipped in behind him. Halsey later commented that it might have been better if he had been in command during the Philippines Sea battle and Spruance in command at Leyte. However, both battles were decisive American victories.
Unlike Halsey, Spruance never received his fifth star. Congress had only authorized the Navy to recommend a limited number of officers to become fleet admirals, and it came down to a choice between Halsey and Spruance. Halsey, the hero of the popular press, was the perhaps inevitable choice. However, Spruance was voted retirement pay for life at the full rate for a four-star admiral.
After the war, Spruance served as president of the
Naval War College, a post this
enthusiastic autodidact had long
coveted. He served as ambassador
to the Philippines and
probably
had a hand in covert U.S. efforts to help Magsaysay become president of
the Philippines. The death of his son in 1969 seems to have put
Spruance into a depression that lasted until his death from stroke
later that year. He
was buried at Golden Gate National Cemetery alongside his close
companions in the Pacific War, Nimitz, Turner, and Lockwood.
| 1886-7-3
|
Born in Baltimore |
|
| 1906-9-12 |
Midshipman
|
Graduates early from Naval
Academy, standing 24th in a class of 209. Assigned to BB Iowa. |
| 1907 |
BB Minnesota |
|
| 1908-9-13
|
Ensign |
|
| 1909 |
Electrical engineering studies,
General Electric Company, Schenectady, New York |
|
| 1910 |
BB Connecticut |
|
| 1911-11 |
AC Cincinnati |
|
| 1913 |
Commander, DD Bainbridge |
|
| 1914 |
Assistant Inspector of
Machinery, Newport News |
|
| 1916 |
Pennsylvania |
|
| 1917 |
New York Navy Yard |
|
| 1919 |
Executive officer, Agamemnon |
|
| 1919 |
Commander, DD Aaron Ward |
|
| 1921 |
Bureau of Engineering |
|
| 1924 |
Commander, DD Osborne |
|
| 1926 |
Naval War College |
|
| 1928 |
Commander
|
Executive officer, Mississippi |
| 1930 |
Instructor, Naval War College |
|
| 1932 |
Captain |
|
| 1933-5 |
Chief of staff, Commander,
Destroyers Scouting Force |
|
| 1935 |
Head, Tactics Section, Naval War
College |
|
| 1938 |
Commander, Mississippi |
|
| 1940-2-26 |
Commandant, 10 Naval District,
Puerto Rico |
|
| 1940-10-1 |
Rear admiral |
|
| 1941-7 |
Commander, 10 Naval District /
Caribbean Sea Frontier |
|
| 1941-9-17
|
Commander, Cruiser Division 5 |
|
| 1942-6-18 |
Chief of staff, Pacific Fleet |
|
| 1943-6-19 |
Vice admiral |
Deputy commander, Pacific Fleet |
| 1943-8-5 |
Commander, Central
Pacific Force |
|
| 1944-2-21 |
Admiral |
|
| 1944-4-26 |
Commander, 5 Fleet | |
| 1945-11-24 |
Commander, Pacific Fleet |
|
| 1946-2-1 |
President, Naval War College |
|
| 1948-7-1 |
Retires from the Navy |
|
| 1952-2-7 |
Ambassador to the Philippines |
|
| 1955-4-1 |
Retires as ambassador |
|
| 1969-12-23 |
Dies at his home in Pebble Beach, California |
References
DANFS
(accessed 2008-1-12)
Pettibone (2006)
Tillman
(2005)
Tuohy
(2007)
The Pacific War Online Encyclopedia © 2006, 2008-2009 by Kent G. Budge. Index